marguerite_26 (
marguerite_26) wrote2011-03-15 01:14 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Meta rec
I've known for a long time that
faithwood is a special kind of brilliant, and her meta posts make my brain orgasm, but I think she's outdone herself this time.
Quality Writing and Comments is a wonderful look at fandom's mentality towards writing, reading and comments and how we interpret quality.
This is not a fandom specific meta. It's relevant to everyone, imo, because I'm very been in a fandom where I haven't seen people look at one story (possibly their own) and say "Why no love, fandom?" and then looked at another (so many pages of comments!!!!) and say "That's because people are stupid."
eta: MORE THOUGHTS! becauseI'm procrastinating I was feeling thinky after I left my comment on that post.
What I like most about this meta is that it's not preaching 'STOP COMMENT COUNTING!!' it's about the concept of taste and preference. I know I sometimes read something that was funny and hit all my kinks and therefore I don't care that your favourite character (in your opinion) was nothing like canon. The fic was AWESOME!!! *recs it all over the place*
And yet that 'perfectly crafted' story that someone else recced I thought was so fucking YAWN. Or the 'hilarious crack' from yesterday was so ridiculous it gave me second hand embarrassment for that author. But you, who I agree with most of the time, thought it was god's gift to fandom.Are you blind???
We like what we like!!! We like some authors more than others and sometimes a lot of people like those funny authors or perverted authors and sometimes the risk takers or the rare pair lovers get no comments and well... that's not fair. *nods*
But it's fandom. And no one is setting out the 'steal' anyone's comments. No one controls fandom's reaction to things. All you can do is accept that fandom isn't fair and deal with the choices you have (get better, write stuff that people love, write what you love, accept that you'll never ever be happy if you stress about the popularity of your fics) or you need to get out, because fandom isn't going to ever be fair.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Quality Writing and Comments is a wonderful look at fandom's mentality towards writing, reading and comments and how we interpret quality.
This is not a fandom specific meta. It's relevant to everyone, imo, because I'm very been in a fandom where I haven't seen people look at one story (possibly their own) and say "Why no love, fandom?" and then looked at another (so many pages of comments!!!!) and say "That's because people are stupid."
Quote from Quality Writing and Comments
I think everyone, more than once, read a popular story and ended up loathing it, or they've read an unpopular story and found it brilliant, or a popular story they loved just like everyone else, or an unpopular story they hated just like everyone else. The first two scenarios anger or confuse us and the latter two make us feel validated. Neither scenario means we're right.
And I think (hope) most people are aware that while they rage about the popularity of some shitty story and celebrate the popularity of a brilliant one, at the same time, somewhere else in fandom, another person rages about the popularity of the story you thought was brilliant and celebrates the popularity of the story you found terrible.
Both individuals have friends who agree with them — and at least one of them is definitely someone who works in the publishing business in Real Life and therefore speaks with authority, because such is the internet — and together they wonder what the hell is wrong with that other group. Why would they like that story? Why would they hate this one? Why do people have such shitty taste? What sorts of machinations enable this injustice? Why-oh-why people can't recognize QUALITY?
eta: MORE THOUGHTS! because
What I like most about this meta is that it's not preaching 'STOP COMMENT COUNTING!!' it's about the concept of taste and preference. I know I sometimes read something that was funny and hit all my kinks and therefore I don't care that your favourite character (in your opinion) was nothing like canon. The fic was AWESOME!!! *recs it all over the place*
And yet that 'perfectly crafted' story that someone else recced I thought was so fucking YAWN. Or the 'hilarious crack' from yesterday was so ridiculous it gave me second hand embarrassment for that author. But you, who I agree with most of the time, thought it was god's gift to fandom.
We like what we like!!! We like some authors more than others and sometimes a lot of people like those funny authors or perverted authors and sometimes the risk takers or the rare pair lovers get no comments and well... that's not fair. *nods*
But it's fandom. And no one is setting out the 'steal' anyone's comments. No one controls fandom's reaction to things. All you can do is accept that fandom isn't fair and deal with the choices you have (get better, write stuff that people love, write what you love, accept that you'll never ever be happy if you stress about the popularity of your fics) or you need to get out, because fandom isn't going to ever be fair.
no subject
It's actually why I tend to enjoy anonymous fests more than non-anonymous ones: it forces everybody to NOT look at an author's name and judge the fic/art solely on its summary, pairings, rating, genre, and quality. Because if people have fears (as they will) that So And So BNF will get more reads because of their name (which is true, and I admit to this too, because if I like an author, I read as much of them as I can - not because they're a BNF but because, as Faith's article points out, I gel with their writing style/perviness/or they make me feel good), then that sort of goes away during an Anon fest. It really proves the crux of this argument too, that fandom isn't fair, because what I would call a bad fic (or one I don't like) still gets read during anon fests and sometimes gets more comments than fics that are so much better written or that I gel with more. Fandom picks what fandom wants, and we're all a part of that, because we're individuals with individual tastes and likes and squicks and nitpicky things we dislike or love and each and every one of us reads what we want and nothing more.
I love that fandom is thinking about all this and discussing it in an open forum. I know there was severe dramallama that brought it up, but reading all this just keeps me sane and aware of the problems that I can often struggle with too. like WHY DONT YOU READ MY DUMBLEDORE/PEEVES FIC, WORLD, ITS SO GOOD AND I SPENT 20 YEARS WRITING THIS EPIC OF AMAZINGNESS.
Sometimes, it's best to read things like this and take a step back to breathe before fandom and its ways drive you insane. :)
(though I'm of the opinion that I actually see quality rewarded more often than not over BNFs and all that - it could just be me "growing up" into fandom and seeing that everyone has certain tastes and if I don't like BNF #5's writing, I don't have to friend her, look at her, read her 50 million comments, etc. I can walk away from a thing like that easily now, whereas, say, when I first entered fandom, I was far more conscious and annoyed by such things)
/ramble!
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Oops, I just deleted a whole paragraph of this comment, so as not to allow you see just how Not.Nice. I can be sometimes. I want everyone to still love me and comment on my posts, after all. ;)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I had to laugh a bit because I wasn't thinking about fanfic so much as very popular profic - Dan Brown's DaVinci Code had me seething at how badly I thought it was written and yet it made millions. Sigh. I guess it is really all about taste.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Great link, thank you!
(no subject)